Capital Budgeting and Compensation with Asymmetric Information and Moral Hazard¤ Antonio E. Bernardo Anderson School of Management at UCLAy
نویسندگان
چکیده
We consider optimal capital allocation and managerial compensation mechanisms for decentralized ̄rms when division managers have an incentive to misrepresent project quality and to minimize privately costly but value-enhancing e®ort. We show that in the optimal mechanism ̄rms always underinvest in capital relative to a naive application of the net present value (NPV) rule. We make a number of novel cross-sectional predictions about the severity of the underinvestment problem and the composition of managerial compensation contracts. We also ̄nd that ̄rms will optimally give greater performance-based pay (at the expense of ̄xed wages) to managers of higher quality projects to mitigate the incentive for managers to overstate project quality. Thus, managers may receive greater performancebased pay because they manage higher-quality projects, not that greater performance-based pay causes ̄rm value to increase. ¤We thank an anonymous referee, Bhagwan Chowdhry, Diego Garcia, Matthias Kahl, Eric Talley, Ivo Welch and seminar participants at UC Berkeley, Chicago, Hebrew University, Humboldt University, London Business School, Oxford, and Tel Aviv University for helpful comments. All errors are ours. yCorresponding author: 110 Westwood Plaza Box 951481, Los Angeles, CA, 90095-1481. tel: (310) 825-2198. fax: (310) 206-5455. e-mail: [email protected]
منابع مشابه
Capital budgeting in multi-division firms: Information, agency, and incentives∗
We examine optimal capital allocation and managerial compensation in a firm with two investment projects (divisions) each run by a risk-neutral manager who can provide (i) (unverifiable) information about project quality and (ii) (unverifiable) access to value-enhancing, but privately costly, resources. The optimal managerial compensation contract offers greater performance pay and a lower sala...
متن کاملCan Capital Defy the Law of Gravity? Investor Networks and Startup Investment∗
In early crowdfunding platforms, backers would directly fund projects without relying on traditional experts to select and curate projects for them. This approach becomes problematic when equity is involved, since the degree of asymmetric information and the risk of moral hazard are higher than in reward-based crowdfunding. Platforms have therefore experimented with market design solutions targ...
متن کاملCapital, Contracts and the Cross Section of Stock Returns∗
We present a tractable, static, general equilibrium model with multiple sectors in which firms offer workers incentive contracts and simultaneously raise capital in stock markets. Workers optimally invest in the stock market and at the same time hedge labor income risk. Firms rationally take agents’ portfolio decisions into account. In equilibrium, the cost of capital of each sector is endogeno...
متن کاملThe Effect of Deviation from Optimal Cash Level on Adverse Selection and Moral Hazard in Firms Listed on Tehran Stock Exchange
This study aims to investigate the impact of deviation from optimal level of cash holdings on adverse selection and moral hazard problems. The data set includes 106 listed firms of Tehran Stock Exchange during the period of 2005-2016 and both panel data and cross-sectional data multivariate regressions were utilized in different stage of analysis to test the hypotheses. According to the optimal...
متن کاملGrowth Options, Beta, and the Cost of Capital∗
We show how to decompose a firm’s beta into its beta of assets-in-place and its beta of growth opportunities. Our empirical results demonstrate that the beta of growth opportunities is greater than the beta of assets-in-place for virtually all industries over all periods of time dating back to 1977. The difference has important implications for determining the cost of capital. For example, when...
متن کامل